When I first thought of the idea for my film opening, I immediately decided on the target audience being 14-25 years of age. I think this is the age band that this genre would appeal to the most, although of course there could be some people outside the target audience that would also enjoy it. Also, it is more aimed towards the ABC1 class, as ideally they will be able to connect with the main character.
I think that most teenagers will be able to enjoy and engage with the film as many at this age feel isolated and have difficulty in knowing what they want to do with their life and hopefully this is something that will inspire them. No matter what gender, stereotype or class, my film deals with many issues that teenagers are having to go through e.g family issues, making choices etc.
Sarah's Media Blog
Sunday, 8 May 2011
Thursday, 5 May 2011
This is my final film opening with an added 'animation' at the beginning, something very rushed and I'm not particularly proud of it but I felt that it was necessary. I missed the lesson on animation as I was ill and never had the chance to catch up. I have tried very hard to improve the quality of the video but I've found no possible way.
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
How did you attract/address your audience?
To begin with, we conducted a lot of Audience Research (which can be seen if you click the link). This was essential to find out what people enjoyed in a film opening, and what they did not. We also asked questions that were specific to our film opening ideas, such as 'In a film opening do you prefer one character introduced or a few characters?' which the answers of helped us to establish whether our ideas would be popular and have an audience appeal.
From the audience research, I found that the most popular genre was a typical romance film because they were the types of film that people could connect with and felt were most realistic. I went against this idea but my film opening could still be perceived as being part of this genre, as it is a very loose plot and could lead into anything. Another thing I found out was that people enjoyed a slow paced introduction more than a faster one, as they felt more confused the faster it was as there is too much to take in. I took this information and used it to create something that was what people liked, in the first two minutes my character makes a paper crane and then burns a pile of letters/photographs which is not too confusing. I did this because I felt that the more simplistic it was, the more the audience would enjoy and understand the beginning as it would give them that impression.
For the target audience of my film opening, I think that the main character is someone that they could relate to. Doing this would attract the audience if they felt that the character was someone they could connect with and envision themselves being this person. Also someone mentioned in the audience research that they liked to 'grow' with the character and as the film is centred around this girl, we are with her all the way until she reaches happiness.
I have also attracted the audience by leaving the opening so open to interpretation that it's possible that almost anything could happen. This would make the viewer want to continue watching the film as it is uncertain what is going to happen and they may want to test what they originally predicted the plot to be.
From the audience research, I found that the most popular genre was a typical romance film because they were the types of film that people could connect with and felt were most realistic. I went against this idea but my film opening could still be perceived as being part of this genre, as it is a very loose plot and could lead into anything. Another thing I found out was that people enjoyed a slow paced introduction more than a faster one, as they felt more confused the faster it was as there is too much to take in. I took this information and used it to create something that was what people liked, in the first two minutes my character makes a paper crane and then burns a pile of letters/photographs which is not too confusing. I did this because I felt that the more simplistic it was, the more the audience would enjoy and understand the beginning as it would give them that impression.
For the target audience of my film opening, I think that the main character is someone that they could relate to. Doing this would attract the audience if they felt that the character was someone they could connect with and envision themselves being this person. Also someone mentioned in the audience research that they liked to 'grow' with the character and as the film is centred around this girl, we are with her all the way until she reaches happiness.
I have also attracted the audience by leaving the opening so open to interpretation that it's possible that almost anything could happen. This would make the viewer want to continue watching the film as it is uncertain what is going to happen and they may want to test what they originally predicted the plot to be.
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
As we worked in a rather large group for the preliminary task, I didn't really have a huge part in operating the camera/editing/coming up with a script, whereas for my film opening I was in control of everything and I had to make my own decisions. This was a huge step in learning. I haven't used much from the preliminary task, except ellipsis. This was an important part of my final media product as it cut actions the character did (e.g making the paper crane) a lot shorter which is more likely to maintain the audiences interest rather than show a continuous shot of the whole thing. It also allows to change shot smoothly without the movement from getting to one place to another whilst filming.
The Preliminary Task was essentially just an exercise in continuity. It helped us to understand that the audience can guess what happened between the two different shots without there being any question. I used this in my film opening as it is just many shots of a continuous action, yet it is broken up every time the shot is changed.
In my opening I used a lot of transitions and effects for the shots to be moved smoothly into each other. This was mainly to suit the mood and speed of the piece. However, in the Preliminary Task we did no editing other than cutting the clips up. There were no transitions which was done on purpose because we felt it was not needed as they were short, sharp and fast paced few shots. Since then I have progressed and learnt to add transitions in to make the film more interesting.
Also editing-wise, we did nothing in the way of changing the colour or saturation of the footage. This is probably something we should have looked into doing as western films are often very 'yellow'. However due to time limitations and the fact that this didn't seem important at the time, we did not do this. In my film opening I changed the colour of the footage which suited the mood more than the neutral/sunny tone it was in, to a more cold, dark and depressing blue-ish colour. I learnt to do this from the mistake we made with the preliminary task, as changing the colour can have a huge effect on the mood.
The Preliminary Task included diegetic sound which was filmed by the camera. This was maybe not the best idea as there is a lot of background noise from others in the area not intended to be in the film, yet could not be moved. In my final piece the song played in the background is non-diegetic. This was again something I learnt from the preliminary, that most of the time background noise is very apparent and in the area where I was filming there was noise from the rushing of the stream and birds. This would have masked dialogue if there was any, but I felt it was best to use a song purely as it would set the mood more so than silence from the character. I originally filmed with the sound included, but as I decided later to put a song in I got rid of the original sounds which I did by turning the audio down on the footage when I edited it.
In the Preliminary, we didn't think very carefully about the shot and just thought of the best way to capture the action and not create something more interesting and visually exciting. As my piece is mainly visual and there is no dialogue, it was important to create something that had a variety of shots and could occupy attention, which I learnt from the Preliminary. My moodboard was something that helped me visually, I found it very important and this was something that was definitely missing from our Preliminary. Also on the visual theme, mise en scéne was something very important in my final piece and one of my favourite parts is the bit where the main character is walking along the train track (below) and it accentuates her loneliness and how small she feels.
The mise en scene in the Preliminary was just as importantly thought out as in my film opening. In the first shot where he is striding up to the door it gives the impression that he is very powerful and authorititive due to the position he is in the frame (centre).
Also when he is on the other side of these doors and starts shouting at the other character, the mise en scene also says a lot about both characters and a dispute they have had.
Tom is sitting at the table with his head down, avoiding eye contact with Ben whos stance incinuates that he is angry and is shouting at him (we can tell from the dialogue that he is). This makes Tom seem ashamed and upset and Ben the one in power, which is exactly the plot.
The Preliminary Task was essentially just an exercise in continuity. It helped us to understand that the audience can guess what happened between the two different shots without there being any question. I used this in my film opening as it is just many shots of a continuous action, yet it is broken up every time the shot is changed.
In my opening I used a lot of transitions and effects for the shots to be moved smoothly into each other. This was mainly to suit the mood and speed of the piece. However, in the Preliminary Task we did no editing other than cutting the clips up. There were no transitions which was done on purpose because we felt it was not needed as they were short, sharp and fast paced few shots. Since then I have progressed and learnt to add transitions in to make the film more interesting.
Also editing-wise, we did nothing in the way of changing the colour or saturation of the footage. This is probably something we should have looked into doing as western films are often very 'yellow'. However due to time limitations and the fact that this didn't seem important at the time, we did not do this. In my film opening I changed the colour of the footage which suited the mood more than the neutral/sunny tone it was in, to a more cold, dark and depressing blue-ish colour. I learnt to do this from the mistake we made with the preliminary task, as changing the colour can have a huge effect on the mood.
The Preliminary Task included diegetic sound which was filmed by the camera. This was maybe not the best idea as there is a lot of background noise from others in the area not intended to be in the film, yet could not be moved. In my final piece the song played in the background is non-diegetic. This was again something I learnt from the preliminary, that most of the time background noise is very apparent and in the area where I was filming there was noise from the rushing of the stream and birds. This would have masked dialogue if there was any, but I felt it was best to use a song purely as it would set the mood more so than silence from the character. I originally filmed with the sound included, but as I decided later to put a song in I got rid of the original sounds which I did by turning the audio down on the footage when I edited it.
In the Preliminary, we didn't think very carefully about the shot and just thought of the best way to capture the action and not create something more interesting and visually exciting. As my piece is mainly visual and there is no dialogue, it was important to create something that had a variety of shots and could occupy attention, which I learnt from the Preliminary. My moodboard was something that helped me visually, I found it very important and this was something that was definitely missing from our Preliminary. Also on the visual theme, mise en scéne was something very important in my final piece and one of my favourite parts is the bit where the main character is walking along the train track (below) and it accentuates her loneliness and how small she feels.
The mise en scene in the Preliminary was just as importantly thought out as in my film opening. In the first shot where he is striding up to the door it gives the impression that he is very powerful and authorititive due to the position he is in the frame (centre).
Also when he is on the other side of these doors and starts shouting at the other character, the mise en scene also says a lot about both characters and a dispute they have had.
Tom is sitting at the table with his head down, avoiding eye contact with Ben whos stance incinuates that he is angry and is shouting at him (we can tell from the dialogue that he is). This makes Tom seem ashamed and upset and Ben the one in power, which is exactly the plot.
Monday, 2 May 2011
What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
Whilst constructing, filming and editing this piece of media I have used many types of technology, such as: Video Camera, Tripod, Camera, iMovie, Windows Movie Maker etc. I had never used Windows Movie Maker before and this was a new experience for me as it is very different to iMovie. This was a slight problem as it was far more time consuming and cutting clips was a bit of a pain. Things like the Video Camera and the Tripod were very easy to use, simply because they had been used before.
Overall, I have learnt that technologies are not always reliable, nor act how you may want them to! Envisioning something in your head is fine, but managing to create it just as planned is much harder.
- JVC Everio GZ-MG334HEK
- Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-W55 was used to take pictures of the character, and possible locations. This again was nothing new to me as it is something I use a lot.
- YouTube- I used this for searching for clips of film openings for research and inspiration. I also used this to upload my film opening to embed it into my blog. Ideally I would have used Vimeo as YouTube caused a huge problem with the quality of the video once I had uploaded it. I couldn't use Vimeo because it refuses to co-operate with my laptop! I learnt how to upload a video to YouTube and edit the information, a slightly different process to using Vimeo which is the website I usually use for uploading.
- Soundcloud - I used this to search for uncopyrighted music to use in my film opening. I spent a long time searching before I found what I was looking for as I felt this was a very important aspect of the opening and that it would complete the mood. I had never used this website before and I had to search in different sections for genre and royalty free music.
- Blogger - This was the blogging website I used to document everything I have done from the beginning, all of the research and planning leading up to my final piece. As I had never used this website before I started my AS work, all of the functions were very new to me. I learnt how to post (and all the things within that e.g tagging, adding pictures), use html and generally mess around with the blog layout and background etc.
- Scanner - I used my scanner to transfer my storyboard from paper to my blog. Also having never used this, it was quite problematic at the time but was much better quality-wise than just taking a photo of the piece of paper.
- Paint - I used this to create the background for my 'animation' at the beginning of the opening. This was very basic and I didn't use any new skills for it.
Overall, I have learnt that technologies are not always reliable, nor act how you may want them to! Envisioning something in your head is fine, but managing to create it just as planned is much harder.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
There are a huge range of labels in the world that produce and distribute films. I have researched a few of them:
This is essentially the child of The Paramount Pictures Corporation which produces and distributes films that have a more 'Art House' feel to them. Some of these include The Virgin Suicides, Sunshine and Winter Solstice. They produce many films based on books and feel that the quality of the film is far more important than a profit.
Known as one of the leading independent film distributors in the UK, based in London and releases about 20 films a year. It has had many successful films including Amélie, The Kings Speech, Lost in Translation, PS. I Love You and Control.
Film4 develops and co-finances films and is known for working with the most innovative talent in the UK, whether new or established. They have released films such as The Lovely Bones, Submarine and Never Let Me Go. This company are particularly interested in young, British film makers so something like this would be perfect.
Any of these media institutions might distribute my media product as many of the things they have produced are very similar to my work. As most of these things have been successful and my film opening fits the same kind of genres, they may be interested in my work.
This is essentially the child of The Paramount Pictures Corporation which produces and distributes films that have a more 'Art House' feel to them. Some of these include The Virgin Suicides, Sunshine and Winter Solstice. They produce many films based on books and feel that the quality of the film is far more important than a profit.
Known as one of the leading independent film distributors in the UK, based in London and releases about 20 films a year. It has had many successful films including Amélie, The Kings Speech, Lost in Translation, PS. I Love You and Control.
Film4 develops and co-finances films and is known for working with the most innovative talent in the UK, whether new or established. They have released films such as The Lovely Bones, Submarine and Never Let Me Go. This company are particularly interested in young, British film makers so something like this would be perfect.
Any of these media institutions might distribute my media product as many of the things they have produced are very similar to my work. As most of these things have been successful and my film opening fits the same kind of genres, they may be interested in my work.
How does your media product represent particular social groups?
As we live in a very stereotypical world, it is easy for my film opening to represent a group. I chose my actor as she looks far different to most people, the pillar-box red hair for a start. If I had to liken her to a character in a film I would choose Oliver Tate from Submarine.
The video above is the trailer for Submarine, I know that the main character is a boy but they share very similar characteristics. Socially they are in the same position, with the tendency of being alone. My main character also shares the awkwardness of Oliver, weird habits/actions and the same intentions.
Stereotypically, my character is 'indie', which means independent. She is iscolated, misunderstood, and wrapped up in her own world - just as many teenagers are. As my target audience is 14-25 which is mainly teens, a particular few of these will be of the stereotype 'indie'.
My character also dresses differently from normal teens - she wears a band t-shirt of a band that no one has heard of, her hair is bright red so she stands out from the crowd. Her social class is not apparent, she is not someone who would care for class as she doesn't see it as important.
However, she could represent any teenage girl, as all she is looking for is hope and happiness, just as Oliver Tate is.
The video above is the trailer for Submarine, I know that the main character is a boy but they share very similar characteristics. Socially they are in the same position, with the tendency of being alone. My main character also shares the awkwardness of Oliver, weird habits/actions and the same intentions.
Stereotypically, my character is 'indie', which means independent. She is iscolated, misunderstood, and wrapped up in her own world - just as many teenagers are. As my target audience is 14-25 which is mainly teens, a particular few of these will be of the stereotype 'indie'.
My character also dresses differently from normal teens - she wears a band t-shirt of a band that no one has heard of, her hair is bright red so she stands out from the crowd. Her social class is not apparent, she is not someone who would care for class as she doesn't see it as important.
However, she could represent any teenage girl, as all she is looking for is hope and happiness, just as Oliver Tate is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)